Presunto Culpable
This weekend, Francisco and I had our first "date" since W arrived on the scene. We left him with his abuelita and tia Nadia and went to see this new Mexican documentary called "Presunto Culpable" (Presumed Guilty). Wow. It was NOT a date movie. But it was amazing.
Presunto Culpable is about the Mexican justice system, specifically about the case of one man accused of murder. Despite multiple witnesses saying they saw him working in the street at the time of the murder, and despite having no gunpowder residue on his hands, he was sentenced to 20 years in prison based on one person's testimony. Some lawyers/academics decided to help him and discovered his previous lawyer was practicing with a fake license. On that basis they were able to appeal and ultimately, after several years (spoiler alert!) he is freed. Which is a good thing, too, because if not, not only would he still be in this horrible prison, but everyone who saw this film probably would have wanted to kill themselves. Like, even more than they already did.
Among the things I learned:
- More than 90% of people convicted of crimes in Mexico are convicted without any physical evidence.
- Around 90% of people who are sentenced for a crime NEVER even lay eyes on the judge. WAY.
- Mexican trials are not like on Law & Order. The trial that took place in this documentary (which amazingly was allowed to be videotaped) took place in something that looked like an office, with the "audience" standing on the other side of a counter and the accused behind a wall, looking through a little window (like the picture above). Also, there is this pretty cool aspect of the trial where the accused has the right to confront his accusers, in a very literal way. The "careo," from the Spanish word for face, is where the accused can ask his accuser questions and the judge just observes the whole thing. In the film, the judge had to occasionally tell the accuser to look at the accused when he was talking to him, because that is the whole point of the exercise. The judge is supposed to be able to learn something from the careo, by observing. I think on the one hand, this could be very useful. On the other hand, it just depends on how the judge interprets your behavior and the other person's. There is no jury.
- Policías judiciales really do have a certain look. (Just kidding, officer. You are each handsome in your own way.) (Also, for the uninitiated, policías judiciales are the cops who round up the people accused of committing crimes. Maybe like a U.S. marshal or something? Anyway, they have a reputation for always getting their man. Or some man, at least, in this case.)
So in this documentary, the accused murderer basically questions his own accuser, who ultimately recants. It's pretty amazing to see a poor, humble person conduct his own defense. He had a great lawyer, but he brought it home himself in the careo. But get this. Even though the ONLY witness RECANTED, the judge still upheld the conviction and left the sentence at 20 years. With VIDEOCAMERAS recording the whole thing. You'd think he'd try to justice it up for the cameras if nothing else. It was just appalling. Fortunately things went better in the next appeal.
I have lived in Mexico for about 4 years now, and although I knew things were dodgy in the world of Mexican justice, I guess I didn't want to know it was that bad. Because I have almost always done things "the right way" (without bribes, etc.) and have found that possible, I wanted to believe that would be true all the way up. In most cases, it's easier to pay a bribe, and cheaper — but you don't "have to." But if you're falsely accused of murder, apparently you'd best just ante up right from the start.
I think many people outside Mexico would hear about this movie and be like, "OK, no justice in Mexico. What else is new?" But even if that's your point of view, I still highly recommend it. It's fascinating. And I'm glad I got to see it, because it's now being pulled from theaters due to a lawsuit by the dude who recanted. Still, ironically, due to another fruit of corruption, piracy, plenty of people will still get to buy bootlegged copies in the street and see it anyway.
If you want to read more, here's the web site (in English).
P.S. See? I can write about things other than mommyhood ![]()


This just in..
By E. EDUARDO CASTILLO=
Associated Press=
MEXICO CITY (AP) A theater chain halted screenings Monday of an
acclaimed documentary about the failings of Mexico's justice system
pending a court ruling on a complaint from a prosecution witness.
The film, ``Presunto Culpable'' (``Presumed Guilty''), and the
legal case against it have drawn renewed attention to Mexico's
secretive, antiquated justice system, which critics say routinely
violates the rights of defendants or fails to convict those who are
guilty.
The Cinepolis theater chain announced it was pulling the film
hours after the Interior Department said it had temporarily revoked
the permit for the documentary. Both the theater chain and the
Interior Department said they must comply with a judge's order
ordering a halt to screenings but would challenge the ruling.
``We profoundly regret that because of this judicial order,
thousands of Mexican will lose the opportunity to know the reality
of our system of criminal justice,'' Cinepolis said in a statement.
The film centers on 26-year-old Antonio Zuniga, who was convicted
of a 2005 murder on scant evidence. Zuniga's conviction was
eventually overturned, a process documented by his lawyers, who
filmed the hearings with the permission of the trail judge.
The documentary, which received the audience award for best
international feature at the 2010 Los Angeles Film Festival, opened
across Mexico on Feb. 18. It was the second-most viewed film in the
country over the weekend, behind the animated movie ``Rango,''
according to the National Chamber of Cinematography.
Last week, a judge in Mexico City ordered authorities to halt
showings pending hearings on a complaint filed by chief prosecution
witness Victor Manuel Reyes Bravo, a relative of the victim. Reyes
Bravo alleges his right to privacy was violated.
The Interior Department initially said the ruling was confusing
and the film should continue to be shown in theaters until the judge
cleared it up.
But Deputy Interior Secretary Hector Villareal told Radio Formula
on Monday that the judge reiterated the order Monday, and the
government would comply. He said the government is appealing.
Carlos Ibarra, the publicist for the film, has said the
filmmakers did not need to seek permission or get release forms from
witnesses because trials are public processes.
One of the main messages of ``Presumed Guilty'' is that greater
transparency and openness can improve a system in which most
convictions are not based on physical evidence, and defendants are
vulnerable to unfounded claims. A message in the film's credits
advises viewers to demand their legal hearings be recorded.
In the movie, some of the prosecution witnesses can be heard
complaining about being filmed. Most do not come off well. Some
stumble over evidentiary details or say ``I don't remember'' when
asked about their testimony.
(cont...)
Reply to this
yeah, I guess I buried the lede! Anyway, the chances of this "witness" having the wherewithal to set this into motion himself is exactly zero.
Reply to this
"Buried the lede"... you can take the Hoya out of The Hoya, but you can't take The Hoya out of the Hoya....
Reply to this
This looks so interesting. I just added it to my Netflix queue for when it comes out on DVD.
Reply to this